|
page 1
Innovative Computer Vision System Detects Foreign Material
on Food Processing Lines
page 2
Researchers
Tackle Challenge of Automatically Inspecting Package Integrity
page 3
Mathematical
Modeling
page 4
Project Spotlight - Sensor-based Cutting System for Deboning Poultry
page 5
Georgia
Tech Dedicates New Food Processing Technology Building
page 6
The French
Connection
<< ATRP Publications
Page
|
Project Spotlight
Sensor-based Cutting System for Deboning Poultry

Top: Debao Zhou, postdoctoral fellow,
makes an adjustment to the prototype device. Bottom:
close-up view of cutting motion. |
|
|
The Challenge
Automating poultry deboning operations has been a goal of the
industry for more than 15 years. Early attempts initially
appeared to be successful until problems began surfacing relative to
sustaining acceptable
yield performance (not leaving too much meat on the bone)
without also yielding unacceptable levels of bone fragments in the product.
The challenge
proved too difficult to resolve with the technology of the
time, and many operations reverted back to manual deboning techniques.
While the
equipment developers have never given up on refining their
designs and in recent years have made strong strides in resolving the
performance
limitations of their earlier systems, many poultry processing
operations continue to rely on manual deboning today.
The primary challenge
faced is adjusting the cutting function
to deal with the natural size and shape variability typical
in many flocks. Some commercial attempts that are proving
successful focus on controlling
the variability that each machine must deal with. Researchers
at Georgia Tech are taking a slightly different approach
and are trying to develop
a “smart” processing machine that uses vision and other sensors
to recognize the size and shape differences of each carcass
and then use that information to tailor the cut made on that
carcass in a way that optimizes
yield and reduces the risk of bone fragments. Initial study
efforts have focused on the scapula cut, which is part of the
wing cut, because it directly
affects the yield of the breast meat (commonly the highest
valued portion of the carcass).
The Mechanics of the Scapula
Cut
At a chicken’s shoulder, three bones – the coracoid, clavicle,
and scapula – come together to form the shoulder support. The moving
part, known as the humerus, is connected through ligaments
and muscle to form the shoulder joint. The scapula is a flat bone with
a three-dimensional
curvature. It starts at the back lower part of the shoulder,
and runs along the back of the body and along the outside of the ribs.
In order to achieve
high yield, the cutting tool is required not only to follow
the bone, but also to follow its orientation.
How the System Works
The sensor-based cutting system is comprised of a vision system,
a cone line, and a cutting system, which consists of a two-axis
manipulator with an attached knife, a force torque sensor,
and a computer controller.
The vision system identifies the correct starting position
for the cut. Then the cone line moves the bird along a predefined
circular path. The
cutting system then moves the knife to adjust to the particular
geometry of the bird to make the required cut.
Initial Test
Results
Initial laboratory tests focused on the ability of a robot
to cut through the joint and follow the scapula while using
force feedback. The test was performed without the aid of the
vision system, thus ensuring
that the robot started at the correct position every time.
This test resulted in the robot being able to successfully
cut through the joint and along
the scapula bone approximately 70% of the time. The research
team ultimately determined that the greatest source of error
in this system was the robot’s
inability to be controlled in real-time. To solve this, a new approach
to the control system and the cutting method was undertaken. This work
has led the team to design a prototype cell where the knife has two degrees
of rotation and the cone has three degrees of freedom (two linear degrees
of freedom and a single rotational degree of freedom). By developing the
hardware in-house, the team has introduced the ability to have a much higher
update rate for the device (3 times a second for the ABB robot versus 200
times a second with the current system), and allows for a much higher responsiveness
in the system. This is critical for the system to be able to identify and
respond to typical variations in the bone structure of each chicken. By
intelligently identifying the meat and the scapula bone and its orientation,
the deboning knife is controlled to keep in contact with the bone with
its surface parallel to the bone plane. The current cutting device achieves
a speed of 0.6 seconds per cut without cutting the bone.
Current Research Focus
Currently, the team is focusing on studying the science of
cutting and on developing a novel circular knife for shoulder
joint cutting. Preliminary experiments using the circular knife
design show that the cutting speed can be improved to one joint
per second with a clean cut, which means that the muscles and
the ligaments between the joint are cut and the socket and
ball of the shoulder joint are exposed. “The cutting
theory that we are developing will help us distinguish between
the meat, ligament, soft bone, and hard bone. It will also
help us design the optimal knife shape and provide the optimal
cutting force and cutting angle, especially for the circular
knife,” explains Debao Zhou, a postdoctoral fellow working
with the research team.
Future Directions
Work will continue on fine-tuning the cutting technique,
with the goal of using these testing results to develop specifications
for the design of a stand-alone prototype device. Researchers
anticipate that this device could be used on new machines
or
retrofitted to existing machines, adding more capability
to adapt to product variability and thereby improving yield. Furthermore,
the team plans to apply the general approaches and principles
of the final design to other meat products, such as beef,
fish,
pork, and turkey, all of which would have inherently similar
natural variability to poultry products.
|