HOME

Seeing the Unseen: Infrared computer vision system could help make meat products safer, tastier, and less costly to produce

By Jane M. Sanders

IN THIS ISSUE

Researchers Design Washdown-Ready Robot to Pack Fresh Meat into Trays

Building “Smart” Deboning Systems

Seeing the Unseen: Infrared computer vision system could help make meat products safer, tastier, and less costly to produce

Emerging Labor-Saving Technology Trends for Poultry Processing Operations

Researchers Make Progress in Design of Non-Robotic System for Chiller Rehang

Electrode Boiler Integral to Mar-Jac’s Feed Mill Efficiency

OSHA Administrator to Address 2007 National Safety Conference for the Poultry Industry

Consumers can expect that meat products will be safer, tastier, and less costly to produce within a year or so as the food processing industry begins to use infrared computer vision scanning systems under development at the Georgia Tech Research Institute.

Pictured left to right, John Stewart, senior research engineer, and Georgia Tech students Michael Matthews and James Lentini, are using an infrared computer vision system to measure core temperature in various meat products.

Pictured left to right: John Stewart, senior research engineer, and Georgia Tech students Michael Matthews and James Lentini, are using an infrared computer vision system to measure core temperature in various meat products.

Infrared (IR) camera technology promises to prevent potentially harmful undercooking and minimize overcooking – which diminishes taste – of ready-to-serve meat products. It is also expected to reduce energy costs and lower yield loss in the food processing industry.

“IR camera technology is evolving,” says Craig Wyvill, division chief of the Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) Agricultural Technology Research Program. “Today’s camera systems are easier to use and much more affordable than systems of just a few years back.”

Some new IR cameras no longer require specialized cooling systems, and the cost of ownership has dropped significantly during the past five years. Such advances encouraged GTRI researchers to explore the use of IR camera technology in screening and controlling thermal operations in food processing plants.

“We started with a study designed to use this technology to help measure product core temperature as it comes out of the oven,” Wyvill explains. “Now, the research has fanned out to include oven control and help for technicians on the production line.

“The technology is fueling opportunity in cooking operations and may make microwave precooking more practical in plants,” he adds. “It could eliminate the risk of undercooking while minimizing the level of overcooking required.”

In the foreground, the computer screen displays an infrared image on the left as it scans chicken nuggets on a conveyor belt.

In the foreground, the computer screen displays an infrared image on the left as it scans chicken nuggets on a conveyor belt.

An initial GTRI study funded by Georgia’s Food Processing Advisory Council (FoodPAC) focused on using IR technology to measure the mean surface temperature and then estimate the core temperature of meat products as they come out of industrial ovens. GTRI senior research engineer John Stewart led that project, which included a field study of GTRI’s IR computer vision system at a Gold Kist plant in Boaz, Ala.

Stewart discovered the system could reasonably estimate core temperature on uncoated, whole-muscle meat and products with a porous coating, such as a light layer of breadcrumbs. But in formed and heavily breaded items, such as chicken fingers, the mean surface temperature is not well correlated with core temperature, Stewart says.

While imaging some of the heavily coated products, researchers discovered that some product had lower surface temperatures than the bulk of product being imaged. Upon closer inspection, they discovered that most of these cold areas were caused by ruptures in the outer casing.

“This finding and the additional observation that the variability of the temperatures measured on the ruptures was lower than the variability of product core temperatures measured by hand reinforced our belief that the near-term potential of IR camera technology is in identifying what is happening as products come out of the oven,” Wyvill explains.

These findings led to a new FoodPAC-funded project that GTRI began in 2006. Now, Stewart and his colleagues are studying how information from IR cameras can be used to control product temperature within emerging microwave precooking technology, which will be used in conjunction with conventional ovens to shorten overall cooking time.

The food processing industry has been leery of microwave cooking because its heating often is non-uniform, Wyvill notes. “But having IR and visible-light cameras working together in conjunction with a microwave can help isolate such problems and provide feedback for quick control adjustments,” he adds.

In the system under development by Stewart and his colleagues, visible and IR cameras work in sync to deliver information on product temperature, color, and size. An algorithm analyzes the data, allowing the system to adjust microwave oven cooking on the fly – something that is more difficult to do with conventional ovens.

“By monitoring the surface temperature of the output product, we can very quickly adapt to variation in the product stream,” Stewart explains. Such a system will allow processors to cook food quickly, thus reducing energy costs, an attractive incentive for the food processing industry.

Companies that design microwave ovens also stand to benefit from this research at GTRI, Wyvill notes. GTRI is already working with some manufacturers on the issue of oven control. “Manufacturers will be able to build microwave ovens with more consistent heating because of the ability to get dynamic feedback that allows operators to address the problem on the fly,” he explains.

Meanwhile, GTRI research is also investigating the use of IR technology for conventional oven control. “We want to create a verification step and a feedback loop to the oven to use the IR signature to adjust oven temperature,” Wyvill explains.

Infrared computer vision technology can do several things for food processing plants using conventional ovens, Stewart says. First, the system can be easily configured to monitor trends across the width of the cooking belt.

“Sometimes a heating element inside an oven will fail, or some other problem will cause one side of the output stream to be significantly hotter than the other side of the product stream,” Stewart explains. “These imbalances are hard to detect with a traditional temperature probe, but a temperature image of the belt can find them quite easily. By eliminating these wide-area trends, one source of temperature variability is removed.”

Another source of variability stems from individual products that are colder than surrounding products on the belt, Stewart says. “An individual chicken breast may appear colder than other pieces on the belt because it was colder than the rest of the product coming into the oven, or it may have been accidentally stacked under another piece of product during the cooking process,” he explains. “By removing these products from the stream, another source of variability is eliminated.”

In addition, GTRI researchers believe IR computer vision technology can help oven technicians in food processing plants as they randomly pull product from conveyor belts to measure core temperature with thermal probes. “We hope to combine ‘augmented reality’ feedback with IR technology to help technicians see product exhibiting temperature extremes or problems so they can focus their measurements on high-risk product,” Wyvill says.

The augmented reality system – already under development in GTRI and the Georgia Tech College of Computing – would shine laser symbols on products at the temperature extremes or those judged to be out of range, informing technicians which products need to be manually checked.

A lot of fully cooked food products are probably being overcooked by 10 to 20 degrees Fahrenheit because of inadequate oven control technology, Wyvill notes.

“Cooking meat to 180 or 190 degrees can ruin its texture, make it loose its aroma, therefore affecting taste,” Wyvill explains. “And it wastes energy to cook it longer and then to quickly cool it for packaging…. Also, these products are sold by the pound, so there is yield loss when products are overcooked and moisture, and therefore weight, is reduced.”

The food processing industry is likely to begin using IR computer vision technology by late 2007, Wyvill says.

Jane M. Sanders is the former editor of Georgia Tech’s Research Horizons Magazine.
Reprinted with permission of the Georgia Tech Research News & Publications Office.

Photography by Gary Meek.

PoultryTech is published by the Agricultural Technology Research Program (ATRP), Food Processing Technology Division (FPTD) of the Georgia Tech Research Institute. ATRP is conducted in cooperation with the Georgia Poutry Federation with funding from the Georgia Legislature.
Agricultural Technology Research Program – GTRI/ATAS/FPTD, Atlanta, GA 30332-0823
Phone: (404) 894-3412 • FAX: (404) 894-8051
Angela Colar - Editor - angela.colar@gtri.gatech.edu