ATRP HOME
RESEARCH BRIEF
Vision-Based Screening System Detects Liner Material in Processed
Foods
Plastic liners and casings are used throughout the beef and poultry
industries to ensure ingredients remain fresh and that meat does not
come into contact with surfaces of cardboard or plastic containers
that may harbor pathogens. Sometimes, despite extensive precautions,
a part of a liner can tear off and become mixed in with a processed
food. Liner pieces are particularly difficult to detect because they
are often small, either transparent or nearly transparent, and coated
with food product or the ingredient that was initially packaged in
the container. Food processors have long sought a method to automatically
detect these materials in processed food.
|

Test image showing contrast achievable with fluorescent liner
material. Georgia Tech researchers have developed a prototype
vision-based screening system that utilizes a FDA-approved additive
to fluoresce the liner material when it is exposed to a particular
wavelength of light. By combining this technique with specialized
imaging technology, plastic liner and other marked plastics can
be more readily detected on a processing line.
|
Researchers with Georgia Tech’s
Food Processing Technology Division believe they have come up with
a technique that could help resolve
this challenge. With funding from Georgia’s Traditional Industries
Program for Food Processing, the researchers have developed a prototype
vision-based screening system that utilizes an FDA-approved additive
to fluoresce the liner material when it is exposed to a particular
wavelength of light. Specifically, the additive contains a UV marker
that fluoresces when excited by a particular frequency of UV light.
Some food components may also fluoresce in this band, but to date,
the team has found this conflict to be minimal and in many cases to
be resolvable through filtering.
The prototype system consists of a
camera to detect the fluorescence from the marker and an illumination
source that will cause the additive
in the plastic material to fluoresce. The camera is equipped with
a narrow band filter that is tuned to the fluorescent marker frequency
and selected to reject the light from the main illumination source.
The filter also rejects typical fluorescence from beef, pork, and
poultry
components under the illumination used to excite the additive.
The
study team has conducted laboratory tests on the concept using ground
beef. Three pieces of the liner surrogate that were approximately
5 mm square were tested, and were detected 20 out of 20 times.
Detection was possible even when the liner was covered with fat from
the meat.
A smaller 2.5 mm square piece was also tested, but the detection
rate for the smaller piece fell to about 75 percent. Liner material
buried
in meat, unfortunately, cannot be detected by the technique.
These initial
tests indicate that occlusion is an important factor in letting pieces
of liner pass through the system undetected. A side
camera was added to the prototype cell to see if it could detect
pieces the primary camera missed. The side camera was also fitted with
a varifocal
lens and filter. This second camera was placed perpendicular to the
first camera and 40 cm from the centerline of the first camera. For
large pieces of plastic material, the detection rate was again close
to 100 percent with just the first camera. For smaller pieces that
were about .5 cm2, the second camera improved the detection rate
on average by 14 percent.
Researchers believe this development has strong
potential for helping the food industry tackle a nagging challenge. “Keeping
plastic liner materials and other plastic components out of food items
is a
serious issue for the food industry. This research demonstrates that
high detection accuracies can be achieved using relatively affordable
enhancement techniques that can be incorporated into the film manufacturing
process,” says John Stewart, senior research engineer and project
director.
“By combining this technique with specialized imaging technology,
plastic liner and other marked plastics can be more readily detected
on a processing
line. Faster identification of plastic in a food stream will reduce
the cost of each incident and allow producers to quickly respond to
what is causing the contamination in the first place,” adds Stewart.
|